Cross Ice Hockey Benefits

Posted 59 CommentsPosted in Uncategorized

 

Source: Getty Images

BONUS – Download a Free Copy of this Blog in PDF Format HERE  

As we are only a few weeks away from kids, coaches and parents returning to ice rinks for the upcoming hockey season I thought it was a good time to discuss the benefits of Cross Ice Hockey.

In many of the clinics I have ran over the years I play clips from a video of Don Lucia when USA Hockey was introducing their ADM Model in 2007.  He touches on several key points, one being his belief that tykes (5-7 years old in the USA) should be playing cross ice games, not full ice.

That was 10 Years ago, right when I was coaching very same age groups and thought the same, as he referenced it was like adults playing on a football field, there would not be much back checking. My analogy for full ice game play for Novice was Beehive, as the lesser skilled players would literally chase the stronger players all around the ice surface, many of which would not touch the puck at all during an entire game.

Below is a short clip that USA hockey did put together several years later showing what it is like for adults to play on a similar playing surface to a football field with nets that are approximately twice the size as traditional hockey nets.

 

USA Hockey mandated Cross Ice Hockey for their 5-8 year old age group in 2014, then for the 2016-17 season, BC Hockey mandated cross ice for the same age groups (Initiation 5-6, Novice 7-8). Saskatchewan Hockey implemented for initiation (5-6 yrs old) group only last season, and in March of this year Hockey Canada announced they will be mandating cross ice hockey nationally for the Initiation Age Groups.  As far as I am concerned, it should have happened years ago and I applaud all of the governing bodies implementing to adhere to LTAD.

While I was running clinics last fall and interacted with coach coordinators, coaches and parents in those same age groups there were many that were for the implementation of cross ice, but also many against. Literally every clinic when I was going to or leaving benches I would walk past parents that were huddled up expressing concerns that cross ice would not prepare their son or daughter for Atom (9-10 yrs old).  I also would hear concerns about it not preparing them for the rep level of Atom, which is supposed to be development age group but give players of higher skill to play with kids of similar skill.

What I found coaching both Atom Rec (House) teams and Atom Rep teams was the same, as soon as kids entered that age group it became competitive even though we should still be adhering to LTAD and learn to play at that age group.

Why ?

Because players do play full ice, they do keep track of scores, wins, losses so teams can win a league or playoff banner regardless if playing rec or rep streams.

That is also when the insanity starts to escalate in the stands.

For all those naysayer’s that I came across last season, I would pull out my smartphone and play the following USA analytics videos for parents to show them all the benefits of cross ice hockey;

According to the analytics, the benefits of small-surface play vs. traditional full size play are as follows:

  1. 2X the body contact battling for the puck
  2. 6X more shots per player
  3. 2X more puck touches per player
  4. 1.75 shots per minute on goalies vs. 0.45 on full ice
  5. 2X more pass attempts per player
  6. 5X more passes received per player
  7. 2X more changes of direction per player

Advanced players benefited even more

  1. 2X more puck touches
  2. 2X more shot attempts
  3. 2X more pass attempts

These are the reasons why USA Hockey, BC Hockey and now Hockey Canada are implementing cross ice for the youngest players, to give them the opportunity to touch the puck vs. what I referred to as bee hive hockey for the first few years.

For the skilled player it is not much fun and for the lesser skilled players it becomes very frustrating and many will give up on the game well before they should as they never touch the puck.

I also had coaches or hockey executive members complain about the following issues;

  1. BC Hockey only gave them 2 months notice to implement, it was voted on at the annual AGM in June and all MHA’s in BC were expected to implement in Sept.

My reply, if we continue to delay, we will continue to fall behind other nations like USA and Europe.

  1. The costs to purchase the boards used to split into two, or for the creative associations 3, sheets of ice to permit cross ice hockey was in the area of 30K and for many smaller associations would require they raise reg fees to absorb the expense.

My reply – it is a one time expense and the cost savings permitting 2-3 teams on one ice surface (with ice costing approx. 200-300.00 per hour depending on where located) should offset within one or two seasons (depending on how many H1-4 teams associations have).

  1. The logistics of setting up for the younger age groups then taking down for the older age groups to permit full ice play would take up to 30 minutes and would affect the total ice time available for all hockey age groups, but also ringette, figure skating, public skating etc.

My Reply – I have known some AMAZING ice schedulers over the years who can make adjustments on the fly to accommodate and having multiple teams share once ice surface would permit potentially more ice slots for the older age groups.

Cross Ice Hockey for U9 age groups is a long time coming, and if you have followed the world juniors the last 2 decades if we do not go down the same path as other nations that are implementing cross ice play for the younger age groups we will continue to struggle at the international level.

The World Juniors has been a showcase for the worlds top U20 players, many of which have been drafted or draft eligible for the NHL.

In the 2000’s Canada dominated, winning 5 consecutive gold medals.

They then won Silver in 2010 and 2011, Bronze in 2012 and did not medal in 2013 or 2014.  In 2015 thanks to an emerging “pretty good player” Connor McDavid and outstanding play by many of his team mates Canada did return to the podium for Gold only to not medal in 2016 and lose to the USA in 2017.

Brent Sutter, coach of the 2014 team that did not medal stated when interviewed after the tournament that he would like to see more skill and creativity and that is what they got beat by on some nights. This starts at the grass roots level when kids are in the early stages of LTAD, and he further comments on the fact that the current Canadian Youth Hockey Model puts too much emphasis on competitive play (games) vs. skill development in practices.

Click here to read the full Globe and Mail article

Although many parents aspired for the kids to play at the rep level where teams are assured to get 2 practices a week, as a result of our current system it still works out to a 1:1 practice to game ratio.  I believe in atom and peewee ages groups which are the key development years of skill acquisition that we should revisit this model and rep teams should only play one game per week and replace the second game with a practice to ensure optimal skill development.  This would change the practice to game ratio to 3:1.  It would not require any additional ice to do so, merely converting one ice slot that is already assigned for those teams to a practice vs. a game slot.  By doing so, I believe the skill and creativity level of Canadian born players would increase exponentially to ensure that we remain competitive at the international level.

 

Hockey Canada 2014 World Junior Team after loss to Russia in the Bronze medal game

USA (3), Finland (2), Russia (1) and Sweden (1) have been the other countries to reach Gold since 2010, all of which have invested heavily in LTAD models.

Although Canada once was Canada’s #1 Youth Sport, it no longer is for a myriad for reasons, Soccer is now the #1 youth team sport by over 100,000 registrants.  Jason De Vos, Director of Development and the rest of the Soccer Canada team also are looking at various means to improve skill development in the younger age groups.

Why ? Because Canada National Men’s Soccer (European Football) program is ranked 117th in the world.

In the keynote presentation he did for Ontario Soccer we shared in this weeks newsletter, he referenced the transformation that Iceland did with their National Football Program, in 2000 they were ranked 131st in the world but due to various initiatives they implemented (including focus on LTAD, skill development with the younger players) they not only qualified for Men’s Europ Cup in 2016 they WON against England !!  Iceland is now ranked 23rd in world as a result and are 1/10th the size of Canada or 1/100th the size of USA in terms of population.

Another nation that has developed some pretty good NHL players is Sweden.  They implemented Cross Ice Hockey years ago, and play until they are 10 (atom age group), and then full ice non-competitive games (no scores kept) until they reach the Bantam Age Group (13-14 years old).  They also have a practice to game ratio of 5:1 as it is in practices (when planned well) that players develop.

Every single coach who played his youth hockey in Europe that I have interacted with over the last 10 years, including several who played professionally, state they don’t understand why there is such an emphasis on competitive games vs. skill development.

For me it started in my first year coaching minor hockey in 2004, H1, 5 year old kids and there were no games, just skill development ice slots but we did incorporate small area games in. Only a month into that season several parents asked me and fellow coaches “when are we going to play games”, to this day I still shake my head the question was posed, most of the kids could barely stand on their skates without falling down and parents wanted to see full ice games.

I look forward to seeing the impact cross ice hockey will have in the coming years, and other initiatives as they are rolled out to continue focusing on Hockey as a long term player development model.

Let’s work together to bring the game back to the kids.

 

PS Tagline - Dont be a kids last coach

 

 

 

Early sport specialization does more harm than good

Posted 3 CommentsPosted in Uncategorized

BONUS – Download a Free Copy of this Blog in PDF Format HERE  

 

 

Many parents feel pressured to specialize their child in one sport early either because they are showing early promise or coaches are pushing extra weekly sessions and year-round training.

According to a survey done by TD Ameritrade as they were concerned that parents were not investing enough for their retirement, although the survey found that 47% of parents felt youth sports was too expensive, 67% aspired for their kids to get a NCAA full scholarship, 43% aspired for their kids to play professionally and 34% potentially would participate in the Olympics.

The reality – less than 1% reach these elite levels of sport.  Use Hockey as an example, over 1.5 Million youth play globally (just wait for China to ramp up and this will increase exponentially) and there are approx 700 player roster spots in the NHL (with the new Vegas Knights franchise) so only 0.3% of those playing will have a shot of playing in the NHL.

Unfortunately many of the coaches that are for early specialization are working for “development” organizations who are making the recommendations for the mere purpose of protecting their livelihood and don’t have the kids best interests at heart.  It has turned into a HUGE business model, and has lead to the professionalization of youth sports vs. when kids played for the love of the game itself.

Kids develop very differently and if you push a child to one specific sport keep the following information in mind.

Aspen Institute Project Play, along with USA Tennis and 50 partner National Sporting Organizations are promoting the benefits of Multiple Sport Participation as a result of declining sports participation the last five years.

 

 

 

The three main issues kids should not specialize early in a sport are;

1.Increased risk of overuse injuries

ACL Surgeries have seen a 400% increase between the ages of 10-17 since 2002, the highest incidence is in female soccer.

Now over 50% of the Tommy John Surgeries are pitchers from High School (15-19 Yrs. Old) , a 9% increase this past year ALONE. This a major surgery on the ulnar tendon that was originally for major league pitchers to extend their playing careers into their 30’s, not provide kids robotic arms in their late teens.  Research shows that once the surgery is done, it does not last.  Many pitchers will see a 3-5 MPH decrease in speed due to the surgery.

 

 

 

One example is Roberto Asuna, pitcher for the Toronto Blue Jays, who had  Tommy John Surgery at 18 years old and in one of the pennant race games last season literally pulled himself from the game as his elbow was too sore to continue.

Why do you think that concussions have escalated to the level they have in recent years ?  It is not just due to the contact kids are taking, it is the type of contact and lack of respect for their opposition and how early it is happening.

Refer to our prior post ” Are contact sports in jeopardy?” and watch the videos of young football players under 10 years old hitting at a level of collegiate players.

The level of contact at earlier age groups has lead to a 200% increase in concussions since 2010 between the middle school age group (9-12 years old) which was one of the driving reasons why USA Hockey and Hockey Canada opted to defer bodychecking until the Bantam Age Group (13-14 years old).

We are demanding too much from developing bodies.  These are major surgeries needing medical attention and are a direct result of kids playing one sport year-round with the same repetitive motor movements.

2.Burnout

70% of kids are quitting ALL organized sports by the age of 13 and replacing their former play time with screen time.  The game they once loved and showed early promise in, are being encouraged by parents and coaches to specialize in one sport as early as seven years old.  Over six years it is the equivalent of over 50-175 % more playing time of one sport compared to the multiple sport model

Kid should play sports seasonally.  Their bodies are less likely to be permanently damaged and their chances of staying active for life increases significantly.

Due to specialization, kids are playing less than 2 sports per year now vs. prior generation would play 3-4 sports plus a multitude of free play activities.  Do you remember when you grew up just playing for playing sake?  Going to a basketball court, playing street or pond hockey, running, biking, swimming at your local pool?  Gone are those days where kids play for hours on end because they loved doing so.

See quote below from the great one, like Wayne Gretzy when he grew up and I believe all would say he turned out to be “pretty good” although he only played hockey seasonally, not year round as many kids do today.

 

3. Decreases in Overall Athletic Development

The science behind Alberta Lacrosse’s Long-Term Athletic Development (LTAD) or Hockey Canada’s Long-Term Player Development (LTPD) models shows that kids are better off focusing on fundamental movement skills across a broad range of sports during their key development years.  Motor skill acquisition at 6-12 years old along with organized and unorganized free play through kids’ teens is the recommended method to introduce kids to a wide variety of activities.

They also cite the benefits of cross training from one sport to the other, for example benefits of playing soccer helping hockey players receive a puck on their skate and kicking to their stick.

For more insight on Physical Literacy  and LTAD, visit Sport for Life’s website www.sportforlife.ca

As coaches or parents of young athletes, ask yourself the following;

  1. Do you know what you want to do in life?
  2. Do you know what your true purpose is?

Whenever I ask those questions at any presentation I do very few hands go up as many do not know the answers until well into their adulthood.

THAN How can we recommend to a 7 year old kid to specialize in one sport for the rest of his or her life?

On the flip side, here is a short clip from John Smoltz’s MLB Hall of Fame induction speech where he touches on the perils of early specialization.

 

 

 Let’s work together to bring the game back to the kids.

 

Don`t be a kids last coach

 

 

 

Are contact sports in jeopardy ? I hope not.

Posted Leave a commentPosted in Uncategorized
In the last couple of week’s I have read articles on the dangers of full contact sports and felt were worth sharing and commenting on.
 
One touching on recent data pertaining to CTE Findings by Boston University and supporting arguments that “Football is still worth risk.
 
Steve Simmons comments on how his two boys (who are now grown men) played several contact sports in their youth and neither suffered a concussion. They played many seasons of contact hockey and football, one even played university football.
 
Reason why I start this week’s post referencing his article is he puts forth the argument that tackling in football is still worth the risk and also believe it is but we MUST make changes immediately to how the game is being coached at the grass roots level.  First, we must eliminate the intentional head to head contact as players are using their helmets meant for their protection as weapons.  Second, we must limit full contact or tackling to later ages to allow for full development of brains to mirror what USA Hockey and Hockey Canada have done removing until Bantam and considering deferring until Midget to ensure players brains are fully developed.  Third, we must reinforce the importance of respecting our opponents and playing for the spirit of the game.
 
To review the article Steve is commenting on and short CNN Video click here
 
To support his argument, Steve shares his youth sports experience of various sports he played including baseball, hockey, football, lacrosse and basketball, all of which I played except lacrosse. My alternate was Rugby. He further shares how many life lessons he learned in football particularly including;
 
  •  Teamwork
 
  • Commitment to stay in school
 
  • Confidence
 
  • Friendships
 
  • Maturation
 
Two that I would add – Respect and Sportsmanship, two values that are missing in youth sports today that are leading to the increasing concussion and injury rates.
 
This list could be endless for me, youth sport teaches us much more than just the skills of the game, but valuable life lessons that we carry forward in non sport activities. That is the role of youth sport coaches, to make a difference by developing youth into adults.
 
For me, contact sports was my way of dealing with the challenges of losing my father when I was really young (he died tragically when I was 8 years old), a means to be aggressive, physical and keep my Irish temper in check. It also provided me surrogate fathers in a sense, as each sport the coaches would take me under their wing and would be not only teach me the skills of the game, but the skills of life. If it had not been all the GREAT coaches I had when I played all those sports, I would not be the man I am today.
 
Another contact sport that has received a lot of press in terms of head trauma’s and concussions is Hockey, recently the “Campaign to ban bodychecking in bantam hockey divides parents”
 
In 2013 Hockey Canada banned body checking until competitive hockey in Bantam, removing it from Peewee and all levels of non-competitive hockey. The reason? Studies found that the brains of peewee aged players (11-12 years old) were still developing and the research found it led to a threefold increase in body and head injuries.
 
I happened to be coaching the peewee age group at the time and witnessed first hand how body checking en masse was leading to concussions. I believe on of the biggest contributors to players getting a concussion was not body checking per se, it was what I call “The Chicken Wing”, players intentionally making head contact with their elbows or hitting players from behind.  Only a small % were due to clean bodychecking done correctly. The other, was players raising arms or sticks to protect themselves in self defence, like all other core skills of hockey, contact confidence takes years to develop.
 
I had the misfortune of watching numerous “chicken wings” by opposing teams on my players and one was such an outright intent to injure I can’t even speak of it at length. While coaching Bantam, I witnessed a 14 year old player elbow one of my players with such intensity it reminded me of the Todd Bertuzzi/Steve Moore Incident as he fell to the ice with opposing player on top of him. My player suffered a major concussion, then when followed return to play protocols suffered another due to a hit from behind.
 
One of the saddest things for me was when his parents sent an email to the team that he would not be returning to play as doctors advised him he could no longer play hockey.
 
He truly loved the game and was only 13!  Unlike 70% of kids today that are quitting youth sports for various reasons, he had to stop playing a game he truly loved because he hit in the head intentionally with an elbow. 
 
After the game as I was walking by the opposing player and his parents were joking with the coach that they would be saving money on travel for a few weeks as he received the maximum penalty possible, a 5 game suspension. It took EVERYTHING I had in me to keep walking, I could not believe a fell coach disrespected the game to that extent and condoned the incident.  In lieu, he should have had a serious conversation with the player and reached out to his association to enforce a longer suspension.  The whole point of having penalties in hockey is not to give the other team a man advantage, it is to deter the behaviour from happening.  
 
As far as I am concerned, both the player and coach should have been suspended for the season, perhaps more, then the message would have been sent.
 
This to me, is the #1 reason why concussions are now rampant in hockey, and you can defer body checking until Senior leagues (Over 30, Over 40) and even though brains are fully developed, players will still get concussed if players initiate contact to the head or hit the players from behind out of the danger zone.
 
Although many were against banning body checking when Hockey Canada did so in 2013, one of the professors that did the initial research to support bodychecking be pushed to Bantam age group confirmed it did have the desired impact
 
  • 64% decrease in concussions
 
  • 50% decrease in overall injuries
 
  • The overall number of concussions across Canada has dropped more than 4,800

See article here

Further research has shown that players brains are still developing beyond the Bantam age group (13-14 years old) so  is the reason for new campaign to defer body checking until Midget age groups but if we do so we are opening Pandora’s Box. Bodychecking, much like any other hockey core skill takes YEARS to development so in order to prepare players for older age groups we must look at a graduated system to prepare them. As the boys become closer to becoming young men, their testosterone levels increase as well as physical size. At some point we have to TEACH proper body checking techniques and the reason we have in hockey to begin with. It is not to separate the player’s head from their body, it is to separate the player from the puck. 
 
The same holds true for football, I played contact football for 9 years all the way to Junior (University age group) and although I got “my bell rung” at times I never was diagnosed with a concussion, nor did I get concussed in contact hockey, rugby, british bulldog (which has now been banned from school playgrounds) or the game we loved the most in high school “tackle basketball”. As far as my friends and I were concerned, it was not a “sport” unless it involved contact, body checking or tackling.   The difference for our age group vs. what I have seen the last 10 years is our coaches reinforced the importance of proper tackling techniques EVERY practice as well the importance of respecting our opponents in game play.
 
The difference in my generation vs. today’s generation and like the chicken wing in hockey, helmets today are not being used for protection as they are intended, in many instances they give players are false sense of security and many will lead with their helmet when tackling or going to be tackled.  
 
Here is a video about an elite 8-9 year old program in Texas, it is a series based on a REAL football program in Texas. Click on the link below for the original trailer for Esquire program Friday Night Tykes.
 
It is no wonder why CTE has been such an issue for the NFL as it all starts at the grassroots, if youth football coaches are not going to teach the safe and proper tackling techniques adhering to the LTAD model then it merely will continue to escalate.  
 
I have talked to several youth football coaches who are but we need ALL youth sport coaches of contact sports to do so, otherwise in addition to Hockey and American Football, other contact sports also may be in jeopardy.
 
So there is no disconnect, I am a big advocate for concussion  and CTE awareness. I am not saying that they are not serious issues, they are, and we should continue doing what is the best interests of kids to ensure they are SAFE.
 
Why am I so passionate about it? Because I suffered 3 major concussions, the third ended my competitive sports career for lack of better word in my 20’s. Ironically though, all 3 were not in a game or practice, one was a result of horsing around with one of my rugby team mates, the latter two were when I came to friends aids in bar brawls.
 
My last concussion I can only tell you what people told me as I have no recollection of the 2 weeks that lead up to the event. One of my friends was hit over the head by a beer mug, I jumped in to grab from his assailant and then one of his friends did the same to me. I was knocked down, and he and his two friends literally kicked and punched me to the point where I was so disfigured after the fact when I looked a pictures taken for police shots I did not even recognize myself.
 
I ended up in an ICU at nearby hospital and awoke groggily 2 days later and had NO IDEA where I was, how I got there and all I could remember is the migraine. Doctors told me that it would take time for me to recover, get lots of bed rest, limited reading, TV etc etc. I missed 2 months of my first college term as a result of the time it took to get back to being symptom free.
 
Needless to say, I can relate to the challenges Sid, Paul Kariya, Eric Lindros and numerous other players have had dealing with to recover from concussions
 
I believe that contact sports are getting a bad rap in a sense that it is the contact itself that is leading to CTE, Concussions. In lieu, many of injuries sustained is due to the the equipment meant to protect but used by players initiate contact leading to same … the hard plastic on elbow pads, the “concussion proof” helmets,  disregard using sticks to slash wrists, helmets or cross checking from behind.
 
Hockey (NHL) and Football (NFL) are getting a lot of press making it a hot topic for last few years but if tackling and contact was such an issue, why are we not looking at taking contact out of other sports ?
 
If contact alone was the driver for CTE, concussions and other injuries, Rugby should be the #1 sport for all but are not even in the top 5, according to Neurotracker, these are the number of high school concussions per 100,000 athletic exposures;
 
  • American Football – 70.4
 
  • Men’s Ice Hockey – 54
 
  • Men’s Lacrosse – 43.3
 
  • Women’s Soccer – 33
 
  • Women’s Lacrosse – 33
 
Honourable Mentions
 
  • Women’s field hockey – 23.5
 
  • Men’s Wrestling – 23
 
  • Women’s Basketball – 19.8
 
  • Men’s Soccer – 19.1
 
Hmmm .. Rugby still not in top 9.
 
Why ? Because it is a hooligan’s game played by gentlemen.
 
The only protective equipment are cleats, mouth guards and perhaps ear wraps (for forwards) and that’s it. Concussions are low or non-existent because players don’t have helmets, elbow pads, sticks that can make contact with players heads, wrists (slashing has become the norm, not the exception in hockey).
 
It is a sport that players still call the ref SIR and when you get older after you go to war with the other team, you socialize with them afterwards.
 
Here is another example of how 8 year olds are being taught to hit others recently posted in Instagram 
 
 
Helmet to Helmet contact starting at 7-8 years old? Coach makes no correction ?
Player attempting to tackle not protecting himself by getting down to drive shoulder into other players core, wrap arms which would avoid any head contact whatsoever.
 
Really?
 
If the NFL, NHL and others want to have players come up thru grass roots they MUST get on board with grass roots programs to bring back respect, proper checking, tackling techniques.
 
Eliminating body checking, tackling from contact sports is not the answer.
 
Reinforcing the importance of Respect, Sportsmanship and other core values is.
 
Let’s work together to bring the game back to the kids.
 PS Tagline - Dont be a kids last coach

Three ways to bring soccer back to the kids

Posted Leave a commentPosted in Uncategorized

 

BONUS – Download a Free Copy of this Blog in PDF Format HERE  

GUEST Contributor – Geoffrey Park, Ontario Soccer Association Official since 2006 and tenured teacher for Ridley College.

 

I was gratified last night to be an Assistant Referee at a Boys Under 18 soccer game. While nobody involved is likely to take part in a World Cup, the caliber was decent. By and large the players had more physical strength and speed than they had skill. Yet this did not lead to confrontations and the game was played and coached with a high level of sportsmanship. In fact, the coaches closest to me were forgiving when I gave a close call against them resulting in a penalty kick.

 

I was impressed enough that after the game I made a point of praising the coaches for their behavior. Games like this one are notable, unfortunately, because they are so rare. Often, we find ourselves involved in games when players, parents or coaches stain the game. This culture has reached the point where bad behavior is barely noticed anymore. Bad behavior can be directed at officials, players, or coaches; it is all part of the same thing. It is up to all of us who care, to be proactive to ensure that minor sports do not lose their fundamental raison d’être (reason for being).

 

I suggest there are at least three concrete steps that can be taken:

 

  1. A written code posted at all venues;
  2. A form signed by coaches and parents at the start of the season;

and

  1. the use of what are known as “field marshals”.

 

 

 

  1. Written Code

 

The Conference of Independent Schools Athletic Association (CISAA) in Ontario established a “Code of Sportsmanship” way back in the 1970’s. It states some things that ought to be obvious, but we all know aren’t. They include that winning is desirable, but winning at all costs defeats the purpose of the game. They also cover respect for officials and opponents. Plaques stating this code are posted at gyms and rinks and changing rooms at member schools. It would be naïve to suggest that this code is always adhered to. I have an anecdote to share of it being ignored, but I do believe that stating these principles in writing and in visible places is a helpful reminder. I have heard officials say they like working games in the CISAA because they know the level of sportsmanship will be higher than average.

 

The counter-example, for your interest, was this. At the end of a senior basketball final in a crowded gym, the officials had to walk through a few spectators to get to their changing room. One of those spectators was a parent of the losing team. He went after them instantly, verbally abusing them and then even following them out into the lobby. I followed, and happened to catch up to them right in front of the Code of Sportsmanship poster. I didn’t raise my voice, but I did point out to this father the line about respecting officials. His response was for me to grow up. It left me wondering how abusing referees was mature.

 

Anyway, it shows that the existence of a code and adherence to it are not necessarily the same thing, but at least it is a start.If minor sports organizations invested a small amount of time and money into developing a code of sportsmanship, they would likely see an increase in participation. Evidence is telling us that many kids quit sports because they become tired of the negative atmosphere created by the parents or coaches.

 

70% of kids are quitting all youth sports by the age of 13, see our prior blog that also touches on the importance of bringing sportsmanship back to the game “Poor Sportsmanship – the Other Reasons why kids quit sports”.

 

 

 

 

  1. A Code of conduct for parents and coaches

 

A similar code was developed recently in Sweden.  “Stop shouting: how Sweden tackled misbehaving parents at kids’ football” is a blog by Marcus Christenson in The Guardian.

 

It describes how a survey within three of the largest clubs in Stockholm found that one in three kids had considered quitting due to “over-engaged” parents. Over-engaged includes parents’ interactions with children, coaches and officials. In response, the clubs came up with this code of conduct form all had to sign at the beginning of the season:“I, as a parent, will do everything I can to support my child, other children, club staff, referees and parents in training and at games – through a positive involvement.”The response has been positive, including requests to print and publicize the code, and it looks likely to expand throughout Sweden. Wouldn’t it be great if it expanded even more? An additional boost was given by a professional member of one of the senior teams. Imagine if someone with the profile of Ronaldo, Messi, Lebron, Sid, and other superstars put their names behind such an idea.

 

Hockey Canada has fair play codes for coaches, parents, players and officials like Swedish Soccer has now implemented that all must review and sign prior to the start of every season.  We recommend that all hockey coaches also review in initial meetings with parents, players and fellow coaches to reinforce the importance and treat as standards for your teams, in event have to deal with issues is a means to hold those accountable as they signed a contract to adhere certain codes of conduct.

 

Here are links to examples each of the forms used by BC Hockey      Parents, Player and Official Fair Play Codes

 

  1. Implementation of Field Marshals

 

The third and most concrete approach is the use of “field marshals.” I first saw this when watching my nephew play soccer in Georgia. Parents on each team took on the role, on a rotation, of field marshal. Their job was to calmly remind their peers not to yell at players or referees. If the ref felt a parent was out of line, he or she could go through the coach, who would ask the field marshal (identified by a vest) to intervene.

 

The reality was that the field marshals had little if anything to do, because the system was in place to prevent problems before they started, and the mere existence of the policy was a constant reminder of what everyone already knows is acceptable behaviour.

 

Many jurisdictions have now adopted this system, including Calgary, Alberta. In some cases field marshals are present at tournaments, and they help with various logistics of the event; management of spectators is only one part of the job. In other places, they are required for all games.

 

 

 

According to the Calgary Minor Soccer Association (CMSA), prior to the implementation of the policy in 2010, 70% of officials quit after their first year. Since the policy came in, attrition has been reduced to 30% as 70% return for a second season.

 

The CMSA Field Marshall Program

 

 

Prior to implementing the Field marshal program Calgary’s attrition rate was more than double the national average of many sports where 33% quit each year (which is still way too high).

 

Under the policy, each team must designate a field marshal whose name appears on the game sheet. This adult is identified by an arm band.

 

The stated responsibilities include:

  • The Field Marshall is expected to act on behalf of the referee by reminding parents to keep their comments to themselves and refrain from vocalizing their complaints during the game.
  • Quickly diffuse potential problems before they arise by either being visible or calmly speaking with the individual(s) involved.
  • Deal with, and act on, inappropriate comments, gestures and/or general unsporting behavior directed at referees, players or any other individual by your teams’ spectators or coaches but please avoid getting into a confrontation. If someone is still hostile after being asked to calm down, please gather as much information but do not put yourself in a dangerous position.

 

For further reading I recommend “Respect Our Referees: A Minnesota State Referee Committee Program. A Guide to Field Marshalling.”

 

This lays out some excellent advice on how to diffuse situations, at first passively and then, if necessary, actively.

 

We are all too familiar with problems in minor sports, and something more than hand wringing is called for. If nothing happens sports run the risk of losing their original role in society and will become simply a Spartan, survival of the fittest, race to professional sports, with fewer and fewer participants. There are tangible steps that can be taken, and the longer we wait the harder it will be to turn around.

Geoffrey Park, Official

Ontario Soccer Association

************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

 

We would like to thank Geoff for his great contribution and look forward to other insights he may share in future.

 

Let’s work together to bring the game back to the kids.

Don`t be a kids last coach

 

 

 

 

Bring back more free play

Posted Leave a commentPosted in Uncategorized

BONUS – Download a Free Copy of this Blog in PDF Format HERE  

Last year, one of the initiatives in the The Aspen Institutes State of Play 2016 Report in the USA was to incorporate more free play..

This is due largely in part to address the declining participation rates in youth sports the USA and all other countries are experiencing globally, as 70% are quitting all organised sports by the age of 13.

Why ? Because organised sport has become TOO organised. Too much structure and not permitting kids merely to play pickup in practices, throw, kick or catch without fear of criticism from adults (coaches, parents).

The trend, sadly, is continuing where more kids between the ages of 6-12 are dropping out of organized sports.

In 2015, the number of kids participating in youth sports in the USA has dropped to 26.6% vs. 30.2% in 2008 for kids between the ages of 6-12.  Similar trends also between the ages of 13-17, dropped from 42.7% in 2008 to 39.3% in 2015.

The majority of organised sports are in decline in the USA over that same period, the exceptions being gymnastics, Ice Hockey, Lacrosse and Field Hockey that have seen slight increases in registrations.  Canada youth sports have seen similar trends, but in our article “Why sports participation in Canada is declining” the sport seeing the most attrition in total participation (youth into adult) in Canada was baseball, almost 50% decrease from 1998 to 2005.

The large reason cited for the sports that have seen increases in registrations year over year, is they have invested heavily in coaching certification programs to develop their youth coaches in the areas of skills, tactics but also Basic First Aid, Concussion Management, General Safety and Injury Prevention, Physical conditioning.  According to the research done, the most trained coaches in the USA are in Lacrosse, and thanks to Hockey Canada’s ongoing direction, they continue to set the bar for coaching certification of minor hockey coaches in Canada.

Five different initiatives of bringing free play in the USA that I hope we will see carry over into Canada;

  1. More and more social and traditional media have focused on the benefits of Free Play including, the Washington Post, Psychology Today promoting the academic, social and sport performance benefits.

Here is a link to article we posted today on Facebook, brief interviews of various people by Aspen Institute Project Play talking about the reduction in free play happening in the USA

How can we get more kids involved in sports?

  1. Major League Baseball and USA Baseball introduced Play Ball – an initiative to encourage participation in all forms of baseball activities including whiffle ball, stickball, skills competitions like Pitch, Hit and Run, Home Run Derby or just playing catch in the backyard. It is being supported by a huge Media Campaign to reinforce all the various elements of the grassroots of baseball … below is an image from one of my favorite movies where kids played baseball for hours on end; Sandlot.

 

 

  1. New York City introduced Street Games – Bringing back low tech games played in the 60-70’s including street hockey, skateboarding, pogo sticks, ultimate disc among others. When is the last time you saw a pogo stick ? Or kids tossing a frisbee around on a street, beach, park or their front yard ?  Playing Street Hockey for hours on end ?

Here is a short trailer discussing the benefits of bring street games back;

I also recall Sidney Crosby fought his former city council when they were trying to ban street hockey as it was “unsafe and caused damage to vehicles” and the social media fallout from that had city council retreat.

Good for NYC to bring back the low tech games … another low tech option that is making a comeback is board games (Remember Monopoly and Risk Marathons) and good old Vinyl Records.

  1. USA Volleyball introducing the concept of letting kids making up their own games playing on various surfaces (dirt, sand or grass) vs. the traditional, drill focused courses in clinics.

Even with these initiatives, literally all youth sports in the USA still experienced decreases in casual play even though many accomplished athletes like Bobby Orr, Wayne Gretzky, Michael Jordan to name a few attribute the reasons for their development in their youth was due largely in part to all the pickup games they played.

What was the key to those casual games?

There were no parents, coaches or officials present.  The kids made up their own rules, enforced them, picked their players to make teams.  There also was not expensive uniforms, +$300.00 cleats, bats, sticks, matching helmets, gloves for home and away games, tracksuits, warm-up gear and all the other costly items associated with organized sports.

Kids just went out and PLAYED for hours upon hours at a time.

  1. Sandlot Lacrosse

 

Lacrosse coach, John Doss, shared in a Facebook group I am part of last year as he introduced “Sandlot Lacrosse” Freeplay Camp, in Clermont, IN, USA.

He told parents to drop off their kids and leave, then he would merely be there to supervise his 12 year old players only from the bench (he admitted hardest thing for him was not to Coach) then told them when to come back.

He felt the goalies benefited most as there was no restrictions to make the save as there was no official scoreboard or game sheets and would take more risks coming out of the crease and at times would run down the playing surface to try and score as well.  This I recall all too well watching my brother who converted from player to goalie but would at times run to mid court to take a shot at the opposing goalies in games even though his stick was much, much larger in full goalie gear. I loved to watch him play, now I have the opportunity to do the same watching my niece/nephews as four of his kids play either box or field lacrosse, including my 7 year old niece.

The biggest positive John Doss shared is that all kids had fun, they made their own rules, picked their teams and although he saw a lot of “bad” lacrosse he felt the benefits far outweighed the drawbacks as it was correctable.  The other aspect that he loved to see is how they played fearlessly as there was no one correcting their “mistakes” as they tried to execute skills they would at times in structured games hold back from.  This is the area that youth sports lacks the most, kids need to be safe to fail, make mistakes so they learn and develop creativity without fear of criticism.

He kicked off Sandlot LAX 2017 a couple of weeks back and roster (total number of participants) was filled in one hour.  The boys can again show up, pick teams, enforce their own rules, resolve own conflicts and just play for hours on end with John merely on the bench to supervise (the deal he had to make with parents who dropped kids off and left).

Do any of these examples bring back fond memories of the free play activities you had when you were a kid?  They all do for me, and although we will never get back to the good old days, we need to find a happy medium so kids can enjoy sports strictly “For the Love of the Game” again so they ultimately play well beyond 13 years old.

Huge Kudo’s to John Doss and the other initiatives in the USA to bring free play back to the game, this is so desperately needed if we are going to keep kids in youth sports and it’s time for similar initiatives to happen in Canada.

It is our job as coaches to instill the passion, love and romance into the kids so they not only play, but they ultimately play for many years to come.

Let’s work together to bring the game back to the kids.

Don`t be a kids last coach